The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur v. Shri Vijay O. Bansal, Nagpur
High Court
25 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur v. Shri Vijay O. Bansal, Nagpur
Date of order
25 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax I, Nagpur v. Shri Vijay O. Bansal, Nagpur, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 21 of 2015 dated10.12.2015, Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 92 OF 2006
-(The Commissioner of IncomeTax I, Nagpur vs. Shri Vijay O. Bansal, Nagpur)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.JANUARY 25, 2016.
Heard Shri Parchure and Shri Mohta,learned counsel for the appellant – department and ShriBhattad, learned counsel for the respondent – assessee.
The relevant Assessment Year is 1996-97and the tax effect is Rs.7,60,000/- only. As such, in thelight of C.B.D.T. Circular No. 21 of 2015 dated10.12.2015, Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
The Registry to refund proportionate courtfee to the appellant.
*GS.
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue