In The Commissioner Of Incometax Iv -Pune v. The Sindh Co-Op.hsg.soc.ltd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONITXA L 1038/2010
The Commissioner of IncomeTax IV -Pune
APPELLANTS
VS.
The Sindh Co-op.Hsg.Soc.Ltd.
RESPONDENTS
Mr.Vimal Gupta for App.None for Res.
CORAM- J.P.DEVADHAR ,ANDDATE -31st JANUARY,2011.
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ.
P.C.
.In this appeal the Tribunal has remanded the issue back
to the file of the Assessing Officer for deciding the question in the light of the judgment of this Court .In this view of the matter since the Tribunal has remanded the matter we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar,J.)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue