The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.audco India Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.audco India Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.audco India Ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: Hence Notice of Motion as well as Appeal stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.61 OF 2009
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2868 OF 2008
The Commissioner of IncomeTax.....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Audco India Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan, for the
Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29th January, 2009
P.C.:
. In our opinion the delay of 843 days has not
been explained. Even otherwise the issue stands
concluded by the judgment of this Court in Income
Tax Appeal No.89 of 2002 decided on 4th February,
2008 on similar issue. Hence Notice of Motion as
well as Appeal stand dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue