The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.mahindraauto Specialities Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.mahindraauto Specialities Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.mahindraauto Specialities Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: On failure to do so, Appeal to stand dismissed without any further orders of this Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.92 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2518 OF 2008
The Commissioner of IncomeTax.....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.MahindraAuto Specialities Ltd...Respondent
Mr. J.S. Saluja, for th Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29th January, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29th January, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering the cause shown delay condoned.
2. If the respondent were not served liberty to
the respondents to apply for recall of this order.
3. Appellant to remove office objections, if any, within six weeks from today. On failure to do so, Appeal to stand dismissed without any further
orders of this Court.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue