The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.marudhar Fashions
High Court
29 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.marudhar Fashions
Date of order
29 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S.marudhar Fashions, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.105 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2179 OF 2008
The Commissioner of IncomeTax.....Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Marudhar Fashions ...Respondent
Mr. K.R. Choudhari with Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for
the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE, JJ.DATED: 29th January, 2009
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 29th January, 2009
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 294 days in preferring
the appeal. Considering the cause shown and the
order to be passed delay condoned subject to the
appellant paying to the respondent costs quantified
at Rs.2,500/- within six weeks from today. On such
amount being paid office to register the appeal
subject also to the appellant removing all office
objections within six weeks from today. If the
respondents are still aggrieved liberty to them to
apply for recall of the order. Notice of Motion
disposed of accordingly.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue