Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of I.t v. Banque Nation...

The Commissioner Of I.t v. Banque National De Paris

High Court 25 Jun 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of I.t v. Banque National De Paris
Date of order
25 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of I.t v. Banque National De Paris, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: The reference is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. INCOME TAX APPLICATION No.51 of 2002. The Commissioner of I.T. Applicant. Vs. Banque National De Paris Respondent. Mr B. M. Chatterjee dwith Mrs P. P. Bhosalefor the applicant.Mr H. Toor i/b Cr. Bayley & Co. for theRespondent. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:25TH JUNE, 2007. P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for applicant and the learned counsel for therespondent. 2.The application pertains assessment order of 1976-77 seeking reference of the following question of law:- "Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunalwas right in law holding that the netamount of interest received fromGovernment or local authority or anyIndian concern would be excluded fromchargeable profits and consequentlyallowing the same under Section 1 (x) ofthe Sur Tax Act, 1964?" By this application the petitioner the to the of the Revenue and against the assessee. The reference is accordingly disposed of. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan