Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of I.t v. Emco Ltd

The Commissioner Of I.t v. Emco Ltd

High Court 12 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

12 Dec 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of I.t v. Emco Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3006 of 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3006 of 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3006 of 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1630 OF 2007. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1630 OF 2007. The Commissioner of I.T. ..Appellant. Vs Emco Ltd ..Respondent. Mr N. R. Prajapati, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2008. DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2008. DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.:---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. 2. Perused Notice of Motion and affidavit in support thereof. By this notice of motion, the Appellant is seeking extension of time for a further period of two weeks from today to comply with the order dated 28.3.2008, whereby the Appellant was directed to deposit Rs 2,500/-. 3. For the reasons stated in the Notice of Motion time to deposit Rs. 2,500/- as per order dated 28.3.2008 is extended for a further period of two weeks from today. Notice of motion stands disposed of. (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C. DAGA,J)(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C. DAGA,J) (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C. DAGA,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.