Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of I.t v. M/S Special S...

The Commissioner Of I.t v. M/S Special Steel Ltd

High Court 15 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of I.t v. M/S Special Steel Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of I.t v. M/S Special Steel Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In view of dismissal of notice of motion, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1497 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1497 OF 2008 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 806 OF 2008. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 806 OF 2008. The Commissioner of I.T. ...Appellant. Vs. M/s Special Steel Ltd. ...Respondent. (Now Tata S.S.Ltd) ------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes,Office : Memoranda of Coram, : Court’s or Judge’s orders appearances,Court ’s : orders or directions & : Prothonotary’s orders. : ------------------------------------------------------------ Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the Appellant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN and V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED : 15TH OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. By this notice of motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of 297 days dalay in filing the above appeal. However, we find that on 10.6.2008 time was taken to serve the respondent till 17.6.2008. Thereafter, the matter again appeared on board on 11.9.2008 on which date none appeared for the appellant. We adjourned the matter on 25.9.2008. Again, time was granted till 10.10.2008 to serve the respondent and file additional affidavit in support of notice of motion as the earlier affidavit was cryptic and not satisfactory. Till today, neither the appellant has taken steps to serve the respondent nor filed additional affidavit. Under these circumstances, we are constrained to dismiss the above notice of motion. 3. In view of dismissal of notice of motion, appeal also stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan