In The Commissioner Of I.t v. Respondent.rao, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) No.2570/2006.
The Commissioner of I.T.
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. ETC Network Ltd.Mr Ashok Kotangale with S.R.Chauhan i/b P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.
Respondent.Rao
Ashok Kotangale with A.S. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:17 April, 2007.
P.C.:-
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
2.The learned counsel for the appellant
seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal.
The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.
3.Proper court fee be refunded in the
above appeal as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
&
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue