In The Commissioner Of Service Tax } v. M/S. Morgan Stanley }, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1180 OF 2016
INCUSTOMS APPEAL (L) NO. 75 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Service Tax}Applicantin the matter of
The Commissioner of Service Tax}versus
Appellant
M/s. Morgan Stanley}Respondent
Ms. P. S. Cardozo with Ms. Shalaka Gujar-Karande for the applicant.
Mr. Vishal S. Jathar i/b. M/s. India Law Alliance for the respondent.
CORAM :-S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED :-OCTOBER 10, 2016
P.C. :-
1.Heard both sides.
2.
2.For the reasons set out in the affidavit in support, the motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
There would be no order as to costs.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue