The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. M/S.essa Shipping Ltd
High Court
22 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. M/S.essa Shipping Ltd
Date of order
22 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. M/S.essa Shipping Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1559 OF 2009
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.510 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs.M/s.Essa Shipping Ltd.
..Appellant
..Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
P.C.
CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATE :- 22ND JULY, 2009
1.The present Notice of Motion is taken out for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. No sufficient cause is shown to condone the same. Apart from this, following the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Chaudharana Steels (P) Ltd. V/s. Commissioner of Central Excise reported in 2009 (238) ELT 705 (S.C.), we have held in the case of CIT V/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Notice of Motion No.787 of 2009 in I.T.A. (L) No.3592 2008) decided on 8/7/2009) that this Court has no power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed being barred by limitation with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue