In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Reliance Consolidated Enter, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Considering the above, the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
WEALTH TAX APPEAL (L) NO.293 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax .. Applicant.
Versus
Reliance Consolidated Enter-
prises Limited .. Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.A.S. Rao and Mr.P.S.
Sahadevan for the applicant.
Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 24TH OCTOBER, 2007.
P.C. :
1. The question of law as formulated in this
appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in
Wealth Tax Appeal No.313 of 2003 decided on
24-10-2007 (CIT V/s. M/s.Akshya Textiles Trading &
Agencies Pvt.Ltd.)
2. Considering the above, the question of law
as framed would not arise and consequently the
appeal is dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue