Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Satvin...

The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Satvinder Singh Kalra

High Court 27 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Satvinder Singh Kalra
Date of order
27 Apr 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Satvinder Singh Kalra, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal.

Decision: In addition to hamdastservice, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted. .Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unservedrespondents, all the above appeals shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondentswithout reference to th...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1387 OF 2007 WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1388 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1390 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1391 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Wealth TaxVs.Satvinder Singh Kalra Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. ..Appellant..Respondent INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1393 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1394 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Wealth TaxVs.Sukhminder Singh Kalra ..Appellant..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1406 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1408 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.Eastern Hatcheries Pvt.Ltd. ..Appellant..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant.Mr.S.N.Inamdar for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1407 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.Kirloskar Copeland..RespondentMr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1409 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.M/s.Common Effluent Treatment Plant..RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L)NO.1412 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax..AppellantVs.Bhalchandra S.Gatne..RespondentMr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. The Commissioner of Income TaxVs.M/s.Essar Oil Ltd. Mr.Sureshkumar for appellant. P.C. ..Appellant ..Respondent CORAM :- V.C.DAGA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 27TH APRIL,2009 .Appellant is directed to remove office objections, if any, and serve all unserved respondents within four weeks from today. .Hamdast allowed. In addition to hamdastservice, private service by R.P.A.D./Speed Post is permitted. .Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections and/or to serve unservedrespondents, all the above appeals shall, accordingly, stand dismissed against the unserved respondentswithout reference to the Court. (J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan