The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan
High Court
16 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan
Date of order
16 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1314 OF 2005
IN
WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.539 OF 2005
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008.
PC :
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.539 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax.
..Appellant.
Vs.
Shri. Shah Rukh Khan...Respondent.
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with B.M.Chatterji &
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. Subhash Shetty for the Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008.
PC :
1. The revenue has preferred this appeal on the
following questions.
was produced that the tenancy is a tenancy from month to
month.
3. We may gainfully referred to Section-4(8) of the
Wealth Tax Act.
(8) A person -
shall be deemed to be the owner of that building or part
thereof and the value of such building or part shall be
included in computing the net wealth of such person.
in our opinion, Question-A as framed would not arise in
in the appeal.
expression "net wealth". In our opinion, therefore, the
said question also would not arise.
6. Appeal accordingly dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.