Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri....

The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan

High Court 16 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan
Date of order
16 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1314 OF 2005 IN WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.539 OF 2005 CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008. PC : (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.539 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Wealth Tax. ..Appellant. Vs. Shri. Shah Rukh Khan...Respondent. Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with B.M.Chatterji & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr. Subhash Shetty for the Respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 16TH JANUARY,2008. PC : 1. The revenue has preferred this appeal on the following questions. was produced that the tenancy is a tenancy from month to month. 3. We may gainfully referred to Section-4(8) of the Wealth Tax Act. (8) A person - shall be deemed to be the owner of that building or part thereof and the value of such building or part shall be included in computing the net wealth of such person. in our opinion, Question-A as framed would not arise in in the appeal. expression "net wealth". In our opinion, therefore, the said question also would not arise. 6. Appeal accordingly dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan