The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri.ashok Ghai
High Court
13 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri.ashok Ghai
Date of order
13 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Wealth Tax v. Shri.ashok Ghai, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Both the Appeals are therefore allowed to be withdrawn and stand dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2002
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2002
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.113 OF 2002
WITH
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.114 OF 2002
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.114 OF 2002
WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO.114 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax .. Appellant
Vs.
Shri.Ashok Ghai .. Respondent
Mr.B.M.Chatterjee i/by Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.
Mr.A.R.Singh with Mr.Manish Doshi i/by M/s.Vimadalal &
Co.for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 13th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. As the tax effect involved in each of the aforesaid
two Appeals is less than Rs.4 lakhs, the learned Counsel
for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw both the
Appeals. Both the Appeals are therefore allowed to be
withdrawn and stand dismissed as such. Permissible
Court fees be refunded to the Appellant as per the
Rules.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.