The Commissioner Ofincome Tax City-21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinay P. Thacker
High Court
15 Jan 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Ofincome Tax City-21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinay P. Thacker
Date of order
15 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Ofincome Tax City-21, Mumbai v. Shri Vinay P. Thacker, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 4359 OF 2006IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2560 OF 2006
The Commissioner ofIncome Tax City-21, Mumbai
Vs.
Shri Vinay P. Thacker
Mr. P. S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent.
Appellant
Respondent
CORAM : Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, AND
A. P. BHANGALE, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 4, 2008.
PC :-
.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
Law and Income Tax department and for taking variousadministrative steps by various authorities such asfor the procurement of stamp paper. We are not atall satisfied with the reasons given in theaffidavit, for condoning the delay, and no case is
made out. Hence, the Notice of Motion standsdismissed.
2.In view of dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 2560 of 2006stands dismissed.
Sd/-[ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. ]
Sd/-[ A. P.BHANGALE, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue