The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax City-Xviii, Mumbai v. M/S Kohinoor Builders
High Court
19 Jun 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax City-Xviii, Mumbai v. M/S Kohinoor Builders
Date of order
19 Jun 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax City-Xviii, Mumbai v. M/S Kohinoor Builders, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.644 of 2004.WITHNOTICE OF MOTION No. 1530 of 2004
The Commissioner ofIncome-tax City-XVIII, Mumbai. ..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s Kohinoor Builders.
..Respondent.
Mr R. G.Bhat for Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:19th June, 2007.
P.C.:-
1.Heardlearnedcounselfor the
appellant. None for the respondent.
2.The learned counsel for the appellantseeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. Theappeal is allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.3.Proper court fee be refunded in the
above appeal as per rules.4.In view of withdrawal of the Appeal, thenotice of motion does not survive and as suchnotice of motion stands disposed ofaccordingly.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue