Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax Mumbai v....

The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax Mumbai v. In View Of Withdrawal Of The Appeal, The

High Court 17 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Apr 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax Mumbai v. In View Of Withdrawal Of The Appeal, The, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: P.C.:- .In view of withdrawal of the Appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. NOTICE OF MOTION No. 191/2004IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.20/2004. The Commissioner ofIncome-tax Mumbai. ..Appellant. versus M/s Hemjit Corpn.Mumbai.Mr R. K. Sharma for Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr Ajay R. Singh i/b K. Gopal Advocate forthe Respondent. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANANDV.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:17 April, 2007. P.C.:- .In view of withdrawal of the Appeal, the notice of motion does not survive and notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.