The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax v. Shardaben P. Choksi). In The Light
High Court
08 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax v. Shardaben P. Choksi). In The Light
Date of order
08 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Ofincome-Tax v. Shardaben P. Choksi). In The Light, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 496 OF 2002
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 496 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai City - XXI, Mumbai. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Mrs Vipula Choksi ..Respondent.
Mr M. A. Kazi, Advocate for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED: 08th OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant.
None appears for the respondent though served.
2. Mr Kazi, learned counsel for the Appellant,
brought to our notice the order of the Division Bench
of this Court dated 12th August, 2008 passed in Income
Tax Appeal No. 543 of 2005 (the Commissioner of
the Commissioner ofIncome-tax vs. Shardaben P. Choksi). In the light
Income-tax vs. Shardaben P. Choksi).
of the said judgment, no substantial question of law
arises for our consideration. Hence, the appeal is
dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue