The Commr. Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. Shri Gurudasmal Thawardas Lalwani (Huf), Akola
High Court
31 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
The Commr. Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. Shri Gurudasmal Thawardas Lalwani (Huf), Akola
Date of order
31 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commr. Of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur v. Shri Gurudasmal Thawardas Lalwani (Huf), Akola, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 79 of 2006
(The Commr. of Income Tax (Central), Nagpur vs. Shri Gurudasmal Thawardas Lalwani (HUF), Akola)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders or directions : Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CORAM : D.D.Sinha and
Mrs. Vasanti A. Naik, JJ.
DATE: January 31, 2008.
Bailiff report shows that the sole respondent – karta of the undivided Hindu family is dead. However, learned counsel for the Appellant seeks one weeks' time to file appropriate application in order to demonstrate that the Appeal can be proceeded against the other members of the undivided Hindu family. Time is granted.
Place the matter after one week for appropriate orders.
ssj
JUDGE
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue