Case Law › High Court › The Commr. Of Income Tax [Central],Nagpu...

The Commr. Of Income Tax [Central],Nagpur v. S.l. Pawar, Aurangabd

High Court 19 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

19 Oct 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In The Commr. Of Income Tax [Central],Nagpur v. S.l. Pawar, Aurangabd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of for being filed before Aurangabad Bench.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Income Tax Appeal No. 150 of 2007 [The Commr. Of Income Tax [Central],Nagpur Vs. S.L. Pawar, Aurangabd] Office Notes, Office Memoranda of or directions and Registrar's orders. Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for the appellant. ----- CORAM: A.H. JOSHI AND R.C.CHAVAN,JJ. DATE : 19th October,2007. Heard. Learned Advocate for the appellant states that the appeal has been wrongly filed at this Bench, since it arises out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune, in respect of the asessee residing within the jurisdiction of Aurangabad Bench. In view of this, Registry to return the appeal along with all annexures thereof to the appellant and to keep on record xerox copies. Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn and is disposed of for being filed before Aurangabad Bench. JudgeJudge |Hedau|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.