Case Law › High Court › The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(...

The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. For

High Court 02 Mar 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Mar 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh v. For, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal stands dismissed in terms of the verdict passed in Tax Case No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TAXC No. 27 of 2023 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax-2(1) Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant Versus M/s Mahendra Sponge And Power Pvt. A Block 2nd Floor, Maruti Business Part, G.E. Road, Near Dhuppar Petrol Pump, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (P.A.N.- A.A.D.C.M.5765E) Business Part, G.E. Road, Near Dhuppar Petrol Pump, Raipur, Chhattisgarh (P.A.N.- A.A.D.C.M.5765E) ---- Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant :Shri Amit Chaudhari along with Shri Ajay Kumrani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Chandravanshi Order on Board Per Goutam Bhaduri, J. 02/03/2023 1. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the issue involved in the case is exactly similar to the one as involved in Tax Case No. 151 of 2018 as well. The said case came up for consideration before this Court on 04.07.2019 and referring to the verdict already passed in Tax Case No. 31 of 2012 and other connected cases interference was declined and the appeal was dismissed.case is exactly similar to the one as involved in Tax Case No. 151 of 2018 as well. The said case came up for consideration before this Court on 04.07.2019 and referring to the verdict already passed in Tax Case No. 31 of 2012 and other connected cases interference was declined and the appeal was dismissed. 2. In the said circumstances, we find it appropriate to decline interference. The appeal stands dismissed in terms of the verdict passed in Tax Case No. 31 of 2012 and other connected matters. Sd/- Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) ( N.K. Chandravanshi) Judge Judge Jyoti

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.