Case LawHigh Court › The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Ci...

The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur

High Court 10 Apr 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
10 Apr 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2677 of 2015 In MA 711 of 2008 ====================================================== 1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mrs. Archana Prasad, Jr. S.C. For the Respondent/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 10-04-2017 An appeal filed by applicants under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order passed on 07.10.2013. The defects, according to the applicants, were six in number. Five of them were removed. Due to some error on the part of the counsel at his place, inadvertently, the sixth defect could not be rectified within the time granted and, therefore, the appeal has been dismissed for want of prosecution. Taking note of the reasons indicated in the application and finding them to be bona fide, the same is Narendra/- U allowed. Miscellaneous Appeal No.711 of 2008 is restored to its original file. Miscellaneous Appeal No.711 of 2008be placed for orders before appropriate Bench. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan