Case LawHigh Court › The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Ci...

The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur

High Court 15 Jan 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
15 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur v. Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.711 of 2008 ====================================================== 1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Appellants Versus Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :For the Appellants : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. Standing Counsel Ms. Shilpi Keshri, Jr. Standing Counsel For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Shikesh Jha, Advocate Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAYORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 9 15-01-2018 This appeal has been filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act and identical appeals filed, involving same questions of law and fact, have already been decided by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court, as is evident from the supplementary counter affidavit filed by the respondents in M.A. No.712 of 2008 vide Annexure-R/1 dated 10.7.2015 and modified on 27.11.2015. Keeping in view the aforesaid, we see no reason to keep the matter pending. For the grounds and reasons already considered in the order passed in M.A. No.712 of 2008, we find no substantial question of law arising for consideration. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) K.C.jha/- U
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan