The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Panaji v. Achintya Mittal
High Court
12 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Panaji v. Achintya Mittal
Date of order
12 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1), Panaji v. Achintya Mittal, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2025
INTAX APPEAL NO.642 OF 2025 (F)
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), PANAJI
... APPLICANT
VersusACHINTYA MITTAL
... RESPONDENT
Ms Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the applicant.
CORAM:- BHARATI DANGRE &ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.DATED :- 12th September, 2025
P.C.:
Heard Ms Linhares on the application seeking condonation ofdelay of 7 days in filing the Tax Appeal, being aggrieved by the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 12.03.2024.
On perusal of the application and on hearing the learnedcounsel, since we find that the delay is procedural in nature andministerial period, it deserves to be condoned.
The application is made absolute in terms of its prayer clause.
The Tax Appeal is directed to be listed on 29.09.2025.
ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.
BHARATI DANGRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue