Case LawHigh Court › The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, C...

The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Salem 636 007 v. Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices

High Court 31 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Salem 636 007 v. Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices
Date of order
31 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(1) Salem 636 007 v. Https://Hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/Hcservices, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirty First day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR WMP.NO.3584 OF 2022 IN WP.NO.23905 OF 2021 1 THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT [ PETITIONERS ]CENTRE, DELHI. 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1) SALEM 636 007 Vs J.RAJESWARAN [ RESPONDENT ] Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein andin the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased toextend the time granted in order dated 10.11.2021 passed inWP.No.23905 of 2021 for a period of three months from date of orderof extension petition. Order : This Miscellaneous petition coming on this day forhearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed insupportthereofand uponhearingthearguments ofM/S.A.N.R.JAYAPRATHAP, Advocate for M/S.A.P.SRINIVAS, Advocate forthe petitioner and of MR.T.VASUDEVAN, Advocate for the Respondent,the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed seeking for extension of furthertime of ninety days from today for the compliance of the orderpassed by this Court made in W.P.No.23905 of 2021 dated 10.11.2021.2. Heard Mr. ANR.Jayaprathap, learned counsel for thepetitioners and Mr.T.Vasudevan, learned counsel appearing for therespondent. 3. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavitfiled in support of this application, I am of the view that thisapplication has to be ordered. Accordingly, this application isordered by granting further time of ninety days from today tocomply with the order as referred to above. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. It is made clear that no further extension of time will begranted. -sd/- 31/03/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI. 2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 1(1) SALEM 636 007 Order in WMP.NO.3584 OF 2022 IN WP.NO.23905 OF 2021 Date :31/03/2022 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format PM(06/04/2022)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan