Case LawHigh Court › The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Ra...

The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur (C.g v. Applicant(S

High Court 07 May 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur (C.g v. Applicant(S
Date of order
07 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
2020-21
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur (C.g v. Applicant(S, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byADITIADITIDIWANDIWANKAIWARTKAIWARTDate:2025.05.0912:31:29+0530 (MCC No. 452 of 2025) 2025:CGHC:21292-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURMCC No. 452 of 2025 1 - The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur (C.G.) versus --- Applicant(s) 1 - Chhattisgarh State Beverages Corporation Limited AabkariBhawan, Chokra Nala, Labhandi, Raipur-492001, Pan -Aaccc3163e, A.Y. 2020-21 --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal andHon'ble Shri JusticeSanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board(08.05.2025) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J 1. Heard on IA No.1, which is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for restorationof TAXC No.205/2024.of TAXC No.205/2024. (MCC No. 452 of 2025) 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, sufficient causehas been shown by the applicant for the delay of 6 dayscaused in filing of this MCC. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 isallowedand the delay is hereby condoned.has been shown by the applicant for the delay of 6 dayscaused in filing of this MCC. Accordingly, I.A. No.1 isallowedand the delay is hereby condoned. 3. Also heard on MCC which has been filed seekingrestoration of TAXC No.205/2024, which was dismissed fornon-compliance of this Court’s peremptory order dated21.02.2025.restoration of TAXC No.205/2024, which was dismissed fornon-compliance of this Court’s peremptory order dated21.02.2025. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same isallowed. TAXC No.205/2024 is restored to its originalnumber for its hearing and disposal in accordance withlaw.allowed. TAXC No.205/2024 is restored to its originalnumber for its hearing and disposal in accordance withlaw. 5. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan