The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 2(3)(1) And Ors v. Gauri Gaekwad
High Court
09 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 2(3)(1) And Ors v. Gauri Gaekwad
Date of order
09 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxcircle - 2(3)(1) And Ors v. Gauri Gaekwad, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 2Accordingly, without making any observation on the merits ofthe case, we hereby set aside the order dated 3[rd] May 2021 impugned in thispetition and remand the matter for denovo consideration.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
GAURIAMITGAEKWAD
Digitallysigned byGAURI AMIT1/2GAEKWADDate:2022.02.1010:46:24+0530IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.2196 OF 2021
Odyssey Corporation Limited
….Petitioner
V/s.
The Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle - 2(3)(1) and Ors.
….Respondents
----
Ms. Dinkle Hariya i/b. Ms. Namrata Kasale for petitioner.Mr. Sham V. Walve i/b. Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 9[th] FEBRUARY 2022
P.C. :
1Mr. Walve states that petitioner's grievance that their objectionto the show cause cum draft assessment order has not been considered inthe assessment order dated 3[rd] May 2021 impugned in this petition andpersonal hearing was not granted appears to be a justified reason andtherefore, the Court may set aside the order dated 3[rd] May 2021 and remandthe matter for denovo consideration.
2Accordingly, without making any observation on the merits ofthe case, we hereby set aside the order dated 3[rd] May 2021 impugned in thispetition and remand the matter for denovo consideration. Notice aboutpersonal hearing shall be communicated to petitioner atleast seven days inadvance and the assessment order, after complying with the procedurerequired, shall be passed within twelve weeks of this order gettinguploaded. If respondents wish to rely on any judgments or order passed by
any Court or Tribunal, he shall provide a copy thereof to petitioner and givethem an opportunity to deal with those judgments or distinguish thosejudgments and those submissions of petitioner shall also be dealt with in theassessment order.
3Petition disposed.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.