The Director Of Income Tax (E v. R.d. Tata Trust
High Court
10 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (E v. R.d. Tata Trust
Date of order
10 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax (E v. R.d. Tata Trust, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2224 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1041 OF 2006
The Director of Income Tax (E).....Appellant
Vs.
R.D. Tata Trust
....Respondent
Mr. R.K. Sharma, for the Appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 10TH DECEMBER 2007
P.C.
.There is a delay of 321 days in preferring the
non-action for whatever reason extraneous or otherwise, ifAppeals are not filed on time it is not possible to dismissevery Appeal as it involves revenue. Considering the abovefacts and circumstances and considering the cause shown wecondone the delay subject to costs of Rs.5,000/- to be paidby the Appellant to Respondent No.1. The said costs to berecovered from the Officers concerned. The Appellant to
file in this Court the receipt of the costs paid to
respondent No.1 within thirty days from today.
.With the above observations Notice of Motion made
absolute. Office to register the Appeal.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue