The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption)… v. Parmeshwaridevi Gordhandas Garodia Charitable Trust
High Court
04 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption)… v. Parmeshwaridevi Gordhandas Garodia Charitable Trust
Date of order
04 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
2007-2008, 2009-2010
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax (Exemption)… v. Parmeshwaridevi Gordhandas Garodia Charitable Trust, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1165 OF 2014
The Director of Income Tax (Exemption)… Appellant
Vs.
Parmeshwaridevi Gordhandas Garodia Charitable Trust
… Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Rahul K. Hakani for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.DATE : 4[th] DECEMBER, 2017
P.C.
1Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. There is no dispute that this Appeal will be governed by the judgment and order dated 12[th] September, 2014 passed by a Division bench of this Court in the case of the Director of Income Tax Vs. Parmeshwaridevi Gordhandas Garodia Charitable Trust in Income Tax Appeal No.822 of 2012. In fact, the said decision is in the case of Respondent – assessee itself pertaining to Assessment Year 2007-2008. The present Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2009-2010. Hence, no substantial question of law arises. There is no merit in the Appeal and the same is dismissed.
(A.K. MENON, J)
(A.S. OKA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.