In The Director Of Income Tax – Exemption v. Shri Ghatkoper Brahmin Samaj, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: DATE : 1[st] December 2011 P.C. : 1.When an application seeking approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was made in Form No.10G on 26[th] July 2007, whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in granting the approval from 1[st] April 2007 instead of granting from the date...
Decision: 3.Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7009 OF 2010
The Director of Income Tax – Exemption..Appellant.
Versus
Shri Ghatkoper Brahmin Samaj
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &A.R. Joshi, JJ. DATE : 1[st] December 2011
P.C. :
1.When an application seeking approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was made in Form No.10G on 26[th] July 2007, whether
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in granting the approval from 1[st] April 2007 instead of granting from the date of application i.e. 26[th] July 2007 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.Perusal of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, particularly para-6 thereof shows that in the present case it is not in dispute that the assessee had fulfilled all the conditions laid down in clauses (i) to (v) of sub-section (5) of Section 80-G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Moreover, the approval sought by the assessee was for the financial year commencing
from 1[st] April 2007 and in such a case, the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in granting approval from the beginning of the financial year i.e. from 1[st] April 2007 cannot be faulted.
3.Accordingly, we see no merit in the appeal and the same is
hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R. Joshi, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.