The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society
High Court
23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society
Date of order
23 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.541 OF 2002
The Director of Income-tax,(Exemptions), Mumbai.
vs.
M/s.Yash Society
Appellant
Respondent
Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.K.R.Rao for the appellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd September 2004
P.C.
Heard.
2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has considered theaspect thus:
"2.
The ground of appeal is:
"On the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case and in law, the learned CIT(A)erred in holding that income of theassessee trust is exempt under section10(22A) of the Income Tax Act. Thelearned CIT(A) failed to appreciate thefact that the income of a hospital isexempt and not that of a Trust runninga hospital."3.The issue stands covered in favour of theassessee by a decision of the learnedIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITANo.8603/Bom/1992. for A.Y. 1989-90 inthe assessee’s own case (order dated31-10-2000).4.It has been held therein, inter alia,
the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in
the matter of assessee for assessment year 1989-90.
4. We do not find any legal infirmity in the order of
the Tribunal.
5. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.