Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions)...

The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society

High Court 23 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society
Date of order
23 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income-Tax, (Exemptions), Mumbai v. M/S.yash Society, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL SIDE INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.541 OF 2002 The Director of Income-tax,(Exemptions), Mumbai. vs. M/s.Yash Society Appellant Respondent Ms.S.V.Bharucha i/b. Mr.K.R.Rao for the appellant. CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 23rd September 2004 P.C. Heard. 2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has considered theaspect thus: "2. The ground of appeal is: "On the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case and in law, the learned CIT(A)erred in holding that income of theassessee trust is exempt under section10(22A) of the Income Tax Act. Thelearned CIT(A) failed to appreciate thefact that the income of a hospital isexempt and not that of a Trust runninga hospital."3.The issue stands covered in favour of theassessee by a decision of the learnedIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITANo.8603/Bom/1992. for A.Y. 1989-90 inthe assessee’s own case (order dated31-10-2000).4.It has been held therein, inter alia, the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the matter of assessee for assessment year 1989-90. 4. We do not find any legal infirmity in the order of the Tribunal. 5. Dismissed in limine. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan