Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions),...

The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society

High Court 16 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society
Date of order
16 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the submission made, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

AGK IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.795 OF 2009 The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai..Appellant. Versus National Health & Education Society..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Ms.Usha Dalal for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 16[th] JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the appeal involving identical questions relating to earlier assessment year being Income Tax Appeal No.714 of 2008 has already been dismissed on 11-6-2008. In this view of the matter, he states that appropriate order may be passed. Considering the submission made, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan