Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions),...

The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society, Mumbai

High Court 22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society, Mumbai
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai v. National Health & Education Society, Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1236 OF 2008 The Director of Income-tax (Exemptions), Mumbai..Appellant.VersusNational Health & Education Society, Mumbai..Respondent. ..Respondent. Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Ms.Usha Dalal for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel for the respondent – assessee. Office objections, if any are waived. Registry is directed to register the appeal. The appeal is taken up for hearing. 2.Both parties agree that the appeals involving identical question being Income Tax Appeal Nos.714/2009 and 795/2009 are dismissed by this Court by an order dated 11-06-2009 & 16-06-2009 respectively. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved. Photocopy of earlier orders are taken on record. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs. (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan