The Director Of Income Tax-Exemptions v. Durgadevi Sharma
High Court
10 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax-Exemptions v. Durgadevi Sharma
Date of order
10 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax-Exemptions v. Durgadevi Sharma, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4552 OF 2007
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2465 OF 2007
The Director of Income Tax-Exemptions ..Appellant
Vs.Durgadevi Sharma
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of 376 days delay caused in filing theabove Appeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof. The only reason givenfor the said delay is, that due to delay in draftingthe Appeal, the Appeal could not be filed in time. Weare not at all satisfied with the reasons given. No
sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.
Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed.
2.In view of the dismissal of the Notice of
Motion, the above Appeal also stands dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue