The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Mahindra Foundation
High Court
03 Apr 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Mahindra Foundation
Date of order
03 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions v. Mahindra Foundation, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, weare not inclined to entertain the above Appeal.Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1364 OF 2000
The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) ..Appellant
Vs.
Mahindra Foundation
..Respondent
None for the Appellant.Mr.Arun Sathe with Mr.Mandar Vaidya for theRespondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.DATE : 3RD APRIL, 2007
1.None appears for the Appellant. The learnedCounsel for the Respondent points out that the taxliability is less than Rs.4,00,000/- in the abovematter. In view of the Circular issued by theGovernment of India, Ministry of Finance, Departmentof Revenue, CBDT, dated 24th October,2005, themonetary limit is fixed at Rs.4,00,000/- with regardto the Appeal under Section 260 A of the Income TaxAct. As the Tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/-, weare not inclined to entertain the above Appeal.Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue