In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-Ii v. M/S.inmarsat Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: In this appeal, the Revenue has raised the following questions for our consideration. “Whether on the fact and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was correct in holding that assessee being non-resident is not liable to pay interest u/s.234B of the I.T.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1934 OF 2011
The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)-II Versus
M/s.Inmarsat Limited
.. Appellant.. Respondent
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant None for the the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR &M.S.SANKLECHA, J.J. DATE : 11[th] FEBRUARY, 2013.
P.C.
In this appeal, the Revenue has raised the following
questions for our consideration.
“Whether on the fact and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was correct in holding that assessee being non-resident is not liable to pay interest u/s.234B of the I.T. Act 1961” ?
2.The Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that the issue arising in this appeal stands concluded by the decision of this Court in the matter of Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) Vs. NGC Network Asia LLC reported in 222 CTR page 85, in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue.
3.In view of the above, we see no reason to entertain the present appeal.
4.Accordingly, appeal is dismissed with no order as to
costs.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.