Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax, Internationa...

The Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation Mumbai v. Administrator Of The Estate Of Late E.f.dinshaw

High Court 20 Sep 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation Mumbai v. Administrator Of The Estate Of Late E.f.dinshaw
Date of order
20 Sep 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax, International Taxation Mumbai v. Administrator Of The Estate Of Late E.f.dinshaw, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
mmj IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1026 OF 2010 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3775 OF 2010 The Director of Income Tax, International Taxation MumbaiVs.Administrator of the Estate of Late E.F.Dinshaw ..Appellant ..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the AppellantMs. Beena Pillai for the Respondent CORAM :- V.C.DAGA & R.M.SAVANT,JJ. DATE :- 20[th] SEPTEMBER ,2010 P.C. 1Heard learned counsel for the Appellant. 2In spite of service, nobody is present for the Respondents. 3The Appeal is restored to file with direction to remove office objections within three weeks, failing which the motion shall be deemed to have been rejected with no order as to costs. 4The delay, if any, stands condoned. 5Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of this order with no order as to costs. [R.M.SAVANT, J] [V C DAGA, J]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan