Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax (Internationa...

The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Bureau Veritas-India Division, Mumbai

High Court 28 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Bureau Veritas-India Division, Mumbai
Date of order
28 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai v. Bureau Veritas-India Division, Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: DATE : 28[th] September 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the fees for technical services paid by the assessee to its head office was not taxable in India and, therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source is the question raised in...

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3377 OF 2010 The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) Mumbai ..Appellant. Versus Bureau Veritas-India Division, Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. DATE : 28[th] September 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the fees for technical services paid by the assessee to its head office was not taxable in India and, therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The finding of fact recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is that the payment made by the assessee to its head office was in the nature of reimbursement of technical expenses and accordingly the amount being not taxable in India, the assessee is justified in not deducting tax at source. Consequently, no disallowance could be made on the said amount of fees for technical services paid by the assessee to its head office. 3.We see no infirmity in the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (K.K. Tated, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan