Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax International...

The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation, Mumbai v. M/S General Tyre International Co.mumbai

High Court 15 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation, Mumbai v. M/S General Tyre International Co.mumbai
Date of order
15 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax International Taxation, Mumbai v. M/S General Tyre International Co.mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3809 OF 2005 INNOTICE OF MOTION NO.707 OF 2002ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.220 OF 2002 The Director of Income Tax International Taxation, Mumbai Vs. M/s General Tyre International Co.Mumbai ....Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. By consent, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (a). Motion disposed off accordingly. ( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.220 OF 2002 The Director of Income Tax International Taxation, Mumbai ..Appellant. Vs. M/s General Tyre International Co...Respondent.Mumbai Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.Mr. A.K. Jasani, Advocate for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. DATE : 15TH JUNE, 2011. P.C. 1. Not on board. Taken on board, by consent of the parties. 2. In the present case, the Assessee had filed an appeal before the ITAT challenging the order passed by C.I.T. under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal by the impugned order dated 2[nd] August 2001 disposed of the appeal on merits by relying upon its order in the case of Assessee for the years 1990-1991, 1991-1992 without going into the question regarding the validity ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal by the impugned order dated 2[nd] August 2001 disposed of the appeal on merits by relying upon its order in the case of Assessee for the years 1990-1991, 1991-1992 without going into the question regarding the validity of the order passed by the C.I.T. under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In this view of the matter, by consent, the order of I.T.A.T. dated 2nd August 2001 is quashed and set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the I.T.A.T. for deciding the question raised by the Assessee. The appeal is disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs. ( SMT.R.P, SONDURBALDOTA,, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan