The Director Of Income-Tax - (International Taxation) Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Infocomm Ltd(Now Merged With Reliance Communicationsltd
High Court
17 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income-Tax - (International Taxation) Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Infocomm Ltd(Now Merged With Reliance Communicationsltd
Date of order
17 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income-Tax - (International Taxation) Mumbai v. M/S. Reliance Infocomm Ltd(Now Merged With Reliance Communicationsltd, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 407 of 2011
The Director of Income-tax - (International Taxation) Mumbai
... Appellant.
Versus
M/s. Reliance Infocomm Ltd(Now merged with Reliance CommunicationsLtd)
... Respondent.
Mr Suresh Kumar, for the appellant.Mr B.G. Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.R. Joshi, JJ.
DATE : 17[th] November,2011.
P.C. :-
1. Counsel for the parties state that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Director
of Income Tax (International Taxation) vs. M/s Tata Chemicals Ltd in Income Tax Appeal (L) No.881 of 2008 dated 18[th] June, 2009. Counsel for the revenue further states that the S.L.P. filed by the Revenue against the decision of this Court in the case of Tata Chemicals Ltd. is pending before the Apex Court.
2.Since the questions raised in this appeal are covered by the decision of this
Court in the aforesaid case, we see no reason to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.R.Joshi,J)
(J.P.Devadhar,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue