Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax (Internationa...

The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. M/S Varian Medical Systems (India

High Court 30 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. M/S Varian Medical Systems (India
Date of order
30 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. M/S Varian Medical Systems (India, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3174 OF 2010 The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai ....Appellant. Vs. M/s Varian Medical Systems (India) ....RespondentPvt. Ltd. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. D. Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ. P.C. DATE : 30TH JUNE, 2011. 1. Question of law raised by the revenue in this appeal, reads thus : “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and inlaw, the Hon ble ITAT was right in holding that the assessee is’not a PE of Varian Group, USA and accordingly, the business profit attributable to the PE is not taxable in India?.law, the Hon ble ITAT was right in holding that the assessee is’not a PE of Varian Group, USA and accordingly, the business profit attributable to the PE is not taxable in India?. 2. Perusal of the order of the I.T.A.T. shows that the question raised in this appeal has been answered in favour of the assessee by in this appeal has been answered in favour of the assessee by following the judgment of this Court in the case of SET Satellite (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax & Anr., reported in [(2008) 307 ITR 205, (Bombay)]. The counsel for the revenue brought to our notice that the S.L.P. filed by the revenue against the order of this court in the case of SET Satellite Pte. Ltd. (supra) had been admitted by the Apex Court. Pendency of the S.L.P. before the Apex Court cannot be a ground to entertain this appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. ( SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan