Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax (Internationa...

The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Admn Of Estate Of Late Shri.e.f.dinshaw

High Court 12 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Admn Of Estate Of Late Shri.e.f.dinshaw
Date of order
12 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Admn Of Estate Of Late Shri.e.f.dinshaw, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3) The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1072 OF 2010 The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation). v. Admn of Estate of late Shri.E.F.Dinshaw. ..Appellant. ..Respsondent. Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. Madhur Agarwal with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 12th September, 2012. PC: This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 30/6/2009 in ITA No.3929/Mum/2008 pertaining to the assessment year 2005-2006. 2)It is admitted by the parties that the question of law raised is covered against the appellant in view of the Judgment of this Court dated 24/4/2012 in The Commissioner of Income Tax v. The Administrator of the Estate of late Shri. E. F. Dinshaw. 3) The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. ( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ) ( S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan