The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Shinhan Bank
High Court
21 Dec 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Shinhan Bank
Date of order
21 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
1998-1999
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Shinhan Bank, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.In these circumstances, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid decision of this Court, these appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1333 OF 2010
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.799 OF 2010ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2827 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2828 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2829 OF 2009
The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)VersusShinhan Bank
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Counsel with Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ.
DATE : 21[st] December, 2010.
P.C. :
1.
Appeal (L) Nos.2827, 2828, 2829 of 2009 & Appeal No.799 of
2010 are not on board. Mentioned.
2.Appeal (L) Nos.2827, 2828 and 2829 of 2009 have been rejected under Rule 986 of the Original Side Rules for want of removal of office objections within the stipulated time. By consent, the objections are waived and these Appeals are restored to the file.
3.Counsel on both sides agree that the question of law raised in these appeals are covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Emirates Commercial Bank Limited reported in (2003) 262 ITR 55. Moreover, the decision of the Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for assessment year 1998-1999 has been accepted by the Revenue and no appeal has been filed against the said order of the Tribunal.
4.In these circumstances, for the reasons stated in the aforesaid decision of this Court, these appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.