Case LawHigh Court › The Director Of Income Tax (Internationa...

The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Thoresen Chartering Singapore (Pte) Ltd

High Court 08 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Thoresen Chartering Singapore (Pte) Ltd
Date of order
08 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Thoresen Chartering Singapore (Pte) Ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2630 OF 2009WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2631 OF 2009WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2632 OF 2009WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2633 OF 2009 The Director of Income Tax(International Taxation)..Appellant. Vs.Thoresen Chartering Singapore(PTE) Ltd...Respondent. .... Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. .... CORAM : DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. 8[th] January, 2010. P.C.: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by its common judgment delivered in four appeals pertaining to the Assessment Years 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2002-03 held that the condition precedent for the exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 viz. the recording of reasons by the assessing officer of the income having escaped assessment was absent in the case of the assessee. As a matter of fact, it was conceded before the Tribunal by counsel appearing for the revenue upon perusing the records that no reasons have been recorded in the case of the assessee for reopening of the assessment. In the circumstances, in the absence of the fulfillment of a statutory condition precedent for the exercise of the power of reassessment, the Tribunal was justified in quashing the proceedings. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue do not raise any substantial question of law and shall stand dismissed. (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan