The Director Of Income Tax (It) -2, Mumbai v. M/S.nickelodeon Asia Holding Pte Limited
High Court
13 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax (It) -2, Mumbai v. M/S.nickelodeon Asia Holding Pte Limited
Date of order
13 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax (It) -2, Mumbai v. M/S.nickelodeon Asia Holding Pte Limited, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.333 OF 2013ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.346 OF 2013
The Director of Income Tax (IT) -2, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.Nickelodeon Asia Holding Pte Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Tejveer Singh for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &M.S. Sanklecha, JJ.
DATE : 13[th] March 2013
P.C. :
Office objections waived.
2.In these appeals by the Revenue for assessment years 2006-07
and 2007-08, following common question of law has been proposed for our consideration.
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in holding that interest charged under Section 234B is not chargeable for default in not deducting the tax at source without appreciating the mandatory requirement on the issue of charging interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?”
3.Since the Tribunal has allowed the claim of the respondent – assessee by following the decision of this Court in the matter of Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. NGC Network Asia LLC reported in 313 ITR 187, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law.
4.Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.
(M.S. Sanklecha, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.