The Director Of Income Tax( It v. M/S. Staubli A.g.india Branch Office
High Court
01 Aug 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax( It v. M/S. Staubli A.g.india Branch Office
Date of order
01 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
2003-04, 2001-02
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax( It v. M/S. Staubli A.g.india Branch Office, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4)The appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ASN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.875 OF 2011
The Director of Income Tax( IT).
V.
M/s. Staubli A.G.India Branch office.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.
Mr. K.Gopal along with Mr. Jitendra Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : -1[st] August, 2012
PC:
In this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
(“the Act”) the revenue has challenged an order dated 5/4/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”) relating to the assessment year 2003-04 by formulating the following question of law for consideration of this court.
a)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ITAT was correct in law in confirming the order of CIT(A) directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs.41.74 lacs made by Assessing officer by estimating the commission income @ 10%?
This appeal raises an identical question of law as was
raised by the revenue in Income Tax Appeal No.896 of 2011 relating to the assessment year 2001-02. We have today by an order dated 1[st ]August, 2012 dismissed the revenue's appeal. The present appeal is from a common order of the Tribunal dated 5/4/2010 dealing with the assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04.
3)Therefore, for the reasons recorded in our order dated 1[st ]August, 2012 in Income Tax Appeal No.876 of 2011, the present appeal is also liable to be dismissed as the question as framed does not raise any substantial question of law.
4)The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
( M.S. SANKLECHA, J. )
( S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.