The Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.general Electric International Inc., Mumbai
High Court
22 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.general Electric International Inc., Mumbai
Date of order
22 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income-Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.general Electric International Inc., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All these appeals are dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1293 OF 2008
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1295 OF 2008
The Director of Income-tax (International Taxation)VersusImmarsat Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.None for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.886 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax – V, PuneVersusShri Klaus Moermann Pune
..Appellant...Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.894 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income-tax - V, Pune
VersusShri Uwe Jarosch
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.890 OF 2009AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.891 OF 2009
The Director of Income-tax, Mumbai
Versus
M/s.General Electric International Inc., Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Parag Vyas for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.The question as framed in these appeals is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Director if Income Tax (InternationalTaxation) Vs. NGC Network Asia LLCreported in (2009) 222 CTR (Bom) 86.
2.In the light of that, thee is no merit in these appeals. All these appeals are dismissed accordingly with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue