The Director Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Sushmavati Educational Trust, Mumbai
High Court
20 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Director Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Sushmavati Educational Trust, Mumbai
Date of order
20 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Director Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Sushmavati Educational Trust, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, in view of utter callousness on the part of the Appellant, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.573 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.573 OF 2000
The Director of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Appellant
Vs.
Sushmavati Educational Trust, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.R.A.Vaishampayan with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 20th August, 2008
DATE : 20th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
1. On 17.7.2008 this Appeal was adjourned to
24.7.2008 to enable the learned Advocate for the
Appellant to file vakalatnama and to serve the
Respondent. Again on 24.7.2008 two weeks time was
granted and the Appeal came to be adjourned to 7.8.2008.
2. Even on 7.8.2008 the vakalatnama was not filed and
the Respondents were not served, and hence we had
adjourned this Appeal to 14.8.2008. Though on 7.8.2008
it was assured by Mr.Vaishampayan that the Respondents
would be served within a period of one week from that
day, till today the vakalatnama has not been filed on
behalf of the Appellant, and no steps whatsoever have
been taken by the Appellant to serve the Respondents.
Mr.Vaishampayan is unable to point out as to what steps
Appellant has taken to serve the Respondents. Hence, in
view of utter callousness on the part of the Appellant,
the Appeal stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.