In The Director Of Income-Tax v. Anda. S. Aguiar Jj, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Income Tax Appeal NO. 906 of 2000
The Director of Income-tax .... Appellant.
vs.
Smt. Chandrakanta Natvarlal Hiralal Sheth Charitable Trust. . ..
... . ... Respondents
A. K. Kotangale for Appellant Mr. Sachin Sarang i/b.F. M. Lala for Respondents.
CORAM:S. RADHAKRISHNAN
ANDA. S. AGUIAR JJ.
Date: 7/6/2005
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per S. Radhakrishnan J.)
1.Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and theRespondents. Perused the assessment order.
2. By this appeal the appellant is seeking to raise an issue as towhether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting thepenalty levied under section 272A(2) (e) when there is no genuine,or reasonable cause justifying the delay in filing the return of incomewhether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in deleting thepenalty levied under section 272A(2) (e) when there is no genuine,or reasonable cause justifying the delay in filing the return of income
under section 139(4A) of the Income Tax Act 1961.
3. We have perused the judgment and order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal dated 1.10.1999. We do not find any perversityor illegality in the reasoning adopted therein, accepting the delay infiling the above return and deleting the penalty levied thereon. Wealso do not find any substantial question of law involved in thisappeal. Appeal is dismissed.
S. RADHAKRISHNAN J.
A. S. AGUIAR J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.